May 02, 2005, 08:54 PM // 20:54
|
#1
|
Ascalonian Squire
|
ANet Brilliance
So after pondering the new econimic model that ANet is using with GW, I have to say that I think they are brilliant. Here are their brightest moves:
(1) No centralized forums: (Grade: B+)
First they cost money in terms of people to run them and moderate them. In the end, company run forums just become a place for loud mouthed players to spout off about how they think the game should be run. There is not a lot of positive for a company to run thier own forums and the potential for a ton of negative.
Of course that makes all of us who care read multiple forums and it is tough to place an opinion where a dev might see it. Still that is not the end of the world. This and other sites have some really nice forums and can moderate out the trolls a lot better.
(2) No monthly fees: (Grade A+)
What's not to like? Beyond not shelling out tons of money to keep playing, they are going to have more incentive to keep their expansions rolling out. Yet the real benefit that I see is to never have to read "if you do not change this, I and the 200 people I am writing for, will quit costing you $xx per month."
If you don't like the game and want to quit, then do so. They are free to design and build a game that they think will be fun without having to worry about loosing $x with each change. I for one am so glad that the worst thing someone can threaten is to not buy some future expansion.
(3) Instanced quests/one world model: (Grade A-)
While it's nice to be in a world with tons of people, the real problem is that you are in a world with tons of people. Let's face it, there is a certain percentage of people in the world that are not fun to be around. Unfortunately, they all seem to play MMO's. Killstealing, gone. Nija looting, gone. Quest camping, gone. Training, gone. Ganking, gone. Lag, mostly gone. Story, very much alive.
It's a great model and lets them have instant patches and the ability to add capacity at any time. The only real disadvantage is that names will become an issue for people down the road since everyone is on the same server.
So hats off to ANet for puting out a fun game with a new way of doing things. In the process, they made some real brilliant moves!
Did I mention that I am so glad to never have to see a "I am quitting and taking my $12/month with me"?
|
|
|
May 02, 2005, 09:11 PM // 21:11
|
#2
|
Academy Page
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canada, eh?
|
Cheers to ANet!
Boo to NCSoft. =/ (Sorry guys.. but please leave this game be... *Looks at Lineage 2 quivering in the corner*)
|
|
|
May 02, 2005, 09:15 PM // 21:15
|
#3
|
Sins FTW!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Guild: Angel Sharks [AS]
|
Always nice to read a positive post.
__________________
|
|
|
May 02, 2005, 10:11 PM // 22:11
|
#4
|
Ascalonian Squire
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bstripp
...
(1) No centralized forums: (Grade: B+)
First they cost money in terms of people to run them and moderate them. In the end, company run forums just become a place for loud mouthed players to spout off about how they think the game should be run. There is not a lot of positive for a company to run thier own forums and the potential for a ton of negative.
Of course that makes all of us who care read multiple forums and it is tough to place an opinion where a dev might see it. Still that is not the end of the world. This and other sites have some really nice forums and can moderate out the trolls a lot better.
...
|
I love this.
I found the forums for CoH and WoW to be nothing but wining and nerf calls. You can't play a AT (class) in CoH without if getting nerfed within a week.
|
|
|
May 02, 2005, 10:20 PM // 22:20
|
#5
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ohio
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banta
I love this.
I found the forums for CoH and WoW to be nothing but wining and nerf calls. You can't play a AT (class) in CoH without if getting nerfed within a week.
|
SWG forums as well
|
|
|
May 02, 2005, 10:25 PM // 22:25
|
#6
|
Ascalonian Squire
|
The main seller to me was the no monthly fees.
|
|
|
May 02, 2005, 11:08 PM // 23:08
|
#7
|
Pre-Searing Cadet
|
This is the company that was started by some ex Blizzard employees right? I wonder if they called it Anet just so that it would beat Bnet lol.
|
|
|
May 03, 2005, 12:52 AM // 00:52
|
#8
|
Ascalonian Squire
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stickyboot
The main seller to me was the no monthly fees.
|
This is a very strong point for me as well. Sometimes I feel a bit lonely walking around in my own instance, but not lonely enough to pay a monthly fee. And I'm only level 7 at the moment so I'm sure it will get better.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
eur0b0y69 |
Sardelac Sanitarium |
33 |
Jan 25, 2006 01:47 PM // 13:47 |
Anet Plz Fix This!!!!!!!!
|
Negative-K |
Screenshot Exposition |
12 |
Jan 19, 2006 02:03 AM // 02:03 |
Please don't do this anet
|
benmanhaha |
Sardelac Sanitarium |
18 |
Sep 17, 2005 06:33 PM // 18:33 |
I hate anet.
|
ZeR04U |
Explorer's League |
47 |
Aug 19, 2005 12:43 PM // 12:43 |
A suggestion to ANet..
|
generik |
Sardelac Sanitarium |
12 |
Aug 15, 2005 03:47 PM // 15:47 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:55 PM // 22:55.
|